Explore the main sections below, click on the interactive framework components, or download the full PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework Draft in PDF format.
The PISA 2022 mathematics framework defines the theoretical underpinnings of the PISA mathematics assessment based on the fundamental concept of mathematical literacy, relating mathematical reasoning and three processes of the problem-solving (mathematical modelling) cycle. The framework describes how mathematical content knowledge is organized into four content categories. It also describes four categories of contexts in which students will face mathematical challenges.
The PISA assessment measures how effectively countries are preparing students to use mathematics in every aspect of their personal, civic, and professional lives, as part of their constructive, engaged, and reflective 21st Century citizenship.
Mathematical literacy is an individual’s capacity to reason mathematically and to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematics to solve problems in a variety of real-world contexts. It includes concepts, procedures, facts, and tools to describe, explain, and predict phenomena. It helps individuals know the role that mathematics plays in the world and make the well-founded judgments and decisions needed by constructive, engaged and reflective 21st Century citizens.
PISA 2022 aims to consider mathematics in a rapidly changing world driven by new technologies and trends in which citizens are creative and engaged, making non-routine judgments for themselves and the society in which they live. This brings into focus the ability to reason mathematically, which has always been a part of the PISA framework. This technology change is also creating the need for students to understand those computational thinking concepts that are part of mathematical literacy. Finally, the framework recognizes that improved computer-based assessment is available to most students within PISA.
The ability to reason logically and present arguments in honest and convincing ways is a skill that is becoming increasingly important in today’s world. Mathematics is a science about well-defined objects and notions that can be analyzed and transformed in different ways using “mathematical reasoning” to obtain certain and timeless conclusions.
In mathematics, students learn that, with proper reasoning and assumptions, they can arrive at results that they can fully trust to be true in a wide variety of real-life contexts. It is also important that these conclusions are impartial, without any need for validation by an external authority.
At least six key understandings provide structure and support to mathematical reasoning. These key understandings include:
Use the arrows below to review the key understandings in-depth
The word formulate in the mathematical literacy definition refers to the ability of individuals to recognize and identify opportunities to use mathematics and then provide mathematical structure to a problem presented in some contextualized form. In the process of formulating situations mathematically, individuals determine where they can extract the essential mathematics to analyze, set up, and solve the problem. They translate from a real-world setting to the domain of mathematics and provide the real-world problem with mathematical structure, representations, and specificity. They reason about and make sense of constraints and assumptions in the problem. Specifically, this process of formulating situations mathematically includes activities such as the following:
** ** This activity is included in the list to foreground the need for the test - item developers to include items that are accessible to students at the lower end of the performance scale.
The word employ in the mathematical literacy definition refers to the ability of individuals to apply mathematical concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning to solve mathematically formulated problems to obtain mathematical conclusions. In the process of employing mathematical concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning to solve problems, individuals perform the mathematical procedures needed to derive results and find a mathematical solution. They work on a model of the problem situation, establish regularities, identify connections between mathematical entities, and create mathematical arguments. Specifically, this process of employing mathematical concepts, facts, procedures, and reasoning includes activities such as:
** These activities are included in the list to foreground the need for the test - item developers to include items that are accessible to students at the lower end of the performance scale.
The word interpret (and evaluate) used in the mathematical literacy definition focuses on the ability of individuals to reflect upon mathematical solutions, results, or conclusions and interpret them in the context of the real-life problem that initiated the process. This involves translating mathematical solutions or reasoning back into the context of the problem and determining whether the results are reasonable and make sense in the context of the problem.
Specifically, this process of interpreting, applying, and evaluating mathematical outcomes includes activities such as the following:
** This activity is included in the list to foreground the need for the test - item developers to include items that are accessible to students at the lower end of the performance scale.
An understanding of mathematical content – and the ability to apply that knowledge to solving meaningful contextualized problems – is important for citizens in the modern world. That is, to reason mathematically and to solve problems and interpret situations in personal, occupational, societal, and scientific contexts, individuals need to draw upon certain mathematical knowledge and understanding.
The following content categories used in PISA since 2012 are again used in PISA 2022 to reflect the mathematical phenomena that underlie broad classes of problems, the general structure of mathematics and the major strands of typical school curricula:
Four topics have been identified for special emphasis in the PISA 2022 assessment. These topics are not new to the mathematics content categories. Instead, these are topics that deserve special emphasis:
The notion of quantity may be the most pervasive and essential mathematical aspect of engaging with and functioning in our world. It incorporates the quantification of attributes of objects, relationships, situations, and entities in the world; understanding various representations of those quantifications; and judging interpretations and arguments based on quantity. To engage with the quantification of the world involves understanding measurements, counts, magnitudes, units, indicators, relative size, and numerical trends and patterns.
Quantification is a primary method for describing and measuring a vast set of attributes of aspects of the world. It allows for the modelling of situations, for the examination of change and relationships, for the description and manipulation of space and shape, for organizing and interpreting data, and for the measurement and assessment of uncertainty.
Both mathematics and statistics involve problems that are not so easily addressed because the required mathematics is complex or involves a large number of factors all operating in the same system. Increasingly in today’s world, such problems are being approached using computer simulations driven by algorithmic mathematics.
Identifying computer simulations as a focal point of the quantity content category signals that, in the context of the computer-based assessment of mathematics, there is a broad category of complex problems. For example, students can use computer simulations to analyze budgeting and planning as part of the test item.
In science, technology, and everyday life, uncertainty is a given. Uncertainty is therefore a phenomenon at the heart of the mathematical analysis of many problem situations, and the theory of probability and statistics as well as techniques of data representation and description have been established to deal with it. The uncertainty and data content category includes recognizing the place of variation in processes, having a sense of the quantification of that variation, acknowledging uncertainty and error in measurement, and knowing about chance. It also includes forming, interpreting, and evaluating conclusions drawn in situations where uncertainty is central. Quantification is a primary method for describing and measuring a vast set of attributes of aspects of the world.
Identifying conditional decision-making as a focal point of the uncertainty and data content category signals that students should be expected to appreciate how the assumptions made in setting up a model affect the conclusions that can be drawn and that different assumptions/relationships may well result in a different conclusion.
The natural and designed worlds display a multitude of temporary and permanent relationships among objects and circumstances, where changes occur within systems of interrelated objects or in circumstances where the elements influence one another. In many cases, these changes occur over time. In other cases, changes in one object or quantity are related to changes in another. Some of these situations involve discrete change; others involve continuous change. Some relationships are of a permanent, or invariant, nature. Being more literate about change and relationships involves understanding fundamental types of change and recognizing when they occur in order to use suitable mathematical models to describe and predict change. Mathematically, this means modelling the change and the relationships with appropriate functions and equations, as well as creating, interpreting, and translating among symbolic and graphical representations of relationships.
Understanding the dangers of flu pandemics and bacterial outbreaks, as well as the threat of climate change, demands that people not only think in terms of linear relationships but recognize that such phenomena need non-linear models reflecting a very rapid growth. Linear relationships are common and easy to recognize and understand, but to assume linearity can sometimes be dangerous.
Identifying growth phenomena as a focal point of the change and relationships content category does not signal an expectation that participating students should have studied the exponential function, and certainly the items will not require knowledge of the exponential function. Instead, the expectation is that there will be items that expect students to recognize (a) that not all growth is linear and (b) that non-linear growth has profound implications on how we understand certain situations.
Space and shape encompass a wide range of phenomena that are encountered everywhere in our visual and physical world: patterns, properties of objects, positions and orientations, representations of objects, decoding and encoding of visual information, and navigation and dynamic interaction with real shapes as well as with representations. Geometry serves as an essential foundation for space and shape, but the category extends beyond traditional geometry in content, meaning, and method, drawing on elements of other mathematical areas such as spatial visualization, measurement, and algebra.
Today’s world is full of shapes that do not follow typical patterns of evenness or symmetry. Because simple formulas do not deal with irregularity, it has become more difficult to understand what we see and to find the area or volume of the resulting structures.
Identifying geometric approximations as a focal point of the space and shape content category signals the need for students to be able use their understanding of traditional space and shape phenomena in a range of atypical situations.
An important aspect of mathematical literacy is that mathematics is used to solve a problem set in a context. The context is the aspect of an individual’s world in which the problems are placed. The choice of appropriate mathematical strategies and representations is often dependent on the context in which a problem arises. For PISA, it is important that a wide variety of contexts are used.
Problems classified in the personal context category focus on activities of one’s self, one’s family, or one’s peer group. Personal contexts include (but are not limited to) those involving food preparation, shopping, games, personal health, personal transportation, sports, travel, personal scheduling, and personal finance.
Problems classified in the occupational context category are centred on the world of work. Items categorized as occupational may involve (but are not limited to) such things as measuring, costing, and ordering materials for building, payroll/accounting, quality control, scheduling/inventory, design/architecture, and job-related decision-making.
Occupational contexts may relate to any level of the workforce, from unskilled work to the highest levels of professional work, although items in the PISA survey must be accessible to 15 - year - old students.
Problems classified in the societal context category focus on one’s community (whether local, national, or global). They may involve (but are not limited to) such things as voting systems, public transport, government, public policies, demographics, advertising, national statistics, and economics. Although individuals are involved in all of these things in a personal way, in the societal context category, the focus of problems is on the community perspective.
Problems classified in the scientific category relate to the application of mathematics to the natural world and issues and topics related to science and technology. Particular contexts might include (but are not limited to) such areas as weather or climate, ecology, medicine, space science, genetics, measurement, and the world of mathematics itself. Items that are intra-mathematical, where all the elements involved belong in the world of mathematics, fall within the scientific context.
Although test - item developers recognize these 21st Century skills, the mathematics items in PISA 2022 are not specifically developed according to these skills.
Below are some example exercises from the PISA 2022 Mathematics assessment. Each button below opens an overlay that shows an example experience from the application.
Jason Hill is a senior research analyst and consultant in the education unit of RTI International, an U.S.-based independent research institute dedicated to improving the human condition. With expertise in education research, Mr. Hill has provided services to the U.S. government and private clients for the past 15 years. His work has centered on surveys and assessments of students, teachers, and postsecondary institutions. Mr. Hill directed a national study of U.S. college students that followed a sample of 35,000 college freshman through higher education and into the labor market. In 2019, Mr. Hill served as a consultant to the OECD in the long-term strategy planning of PISA beyond 2025. Mr. Hill also leads a business development team with the express intent to fostering innovation and business growth. He has a master’s degree from The George Washington University, and resides in Raleigh, NC.
Andreas Schleicher is Director for Education and Skills, and Special Advisor on Education Policy to the Secretary-General at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). He initiated and oversees the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and other international instruments which create a global platform for policy-makers, researchers and educators to innovate and transform educational policies and practices. He has worked for over 20 years with Ministers and educational leaders around the world to improve quality and equity in education. U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said about Andreas in The Atlantic (7/2011) that “He understands the global issues and challenges as well as or better than anyone I’ve met, and he tells me the truth”. Secretary of State Michael Gove in the United Kingdom called Andreas “the most important man in English education”, never mind that he is German and lives in France. Andreas is the recipient of numerous honours and awards, including the “Theodor Heuss” prize, awarded for “exemplary democratic engagement” in the name of the first president of the Federal Republic of Germany. He holds an honorary professorship at the University of Heidelberg.
Laurie Miles is a Senior Director for SAS UK & Ireland and a renowned industry expert in all things Analytics. With 30 years of real-world analytics experience and expertise, Laurie provides analytics guidance and thought leadership both internally at SAS and with customer and prospects across all industry sectors. Laurie joined SAS in 1996 as a consultant delivering analysis focussed projects to organisations and in 2000, became SAS UK’s Head of Retail Banking Technology. Laurie’s career took an international turn in 2003 when he became responsible for SAS’ technical management of HSBC globally, where his expertise supported the bank’s global use of advanced analytics. He continued in this role until January 2008 when he was asked to form the SAS UK Analytics Practice as the Head of Analytics for SAS UK and Ireland. During this time, Laurie worked with some of the UK’s largest organisations providing strategic advice and forming industry best practice. He also pioneered the development of the SAS Results-as-a-Service analytics solution. In January 2015, he was appointed to lead this globally as part of the SAS Cloud Analytics proposition which went from strength to strength in 2016 with projects being delivered all over the world; it is now one of the key SAS global initiatives. Following this success, Laurie returned to SAS UKI in February 2017 to his current role: leading the pre-sales organisation. Laurie holds a BSc in Econometrics, an MSc in Game Theory and a PhD in Number Theory.
Lucy Dasgupta is the Strategic Leader for Mathematics and Director of Teaching and Learning at John Mason School, Abingdon, Oxfordshire. She has taught mathematics to 11-18-year olds in mixed comprehensive secondary schools in Oxfordshire for over 25 years. She has collaborated with members of the Department of Education, Oxford University on research projects focusing on classroom discourse and the teaching of functions. She completed her own action research projects as part of her MSc in Learning and Teaching on aspects of verbal and written feedback in maths classrooms. She has worked as a PGCE mentor, professional tutor and part-time curriculum tutor for the Department of Education, Oxford University. She has an interest in the professional development of maths teachers and established and runs a local teacher network group.